Ir al contenido principal

BIBLIOGUÍAS

Revisiones sistemáticas: Tipos de preguntas estructuradas para la síntesis de evidencia cualitativa

Guía introductoria sobre qué es una revisión sistemática, los tipos de revisiones, los pasos para realizar una revisión sistemática y otros recursos de utilidad.

Tipos de preguntas estructuradas para la síntesis de evidencia cualitativa

Consulta en el siguiente esquema los 38 tipos de preguntas estructuradas.1   Ten en cuenta que ninguno de los formatos existentes es totalmente adecuado para captar toda la complejidad cuando se abordan cuestiones que pueden responderse mediante síntesis cualitativas. 

PREGUNTA ELEMENTOS
3WH Who, What, When, How (study conducted)
BeHEMoTh Behaviour, Health context, Exclusions, Models or Theories
CHIP Context, How (study conducted), Issues, People
CIMO Context, Interventions, Mechanisms, Outcomes
CoCoPop Condition, Context, Population 
CPTM Construct of interest or the name of the measurement instrument(s), Population, Type of measurement instrument, Measurement properties
ECLIPSe Expectations (improvement, innovation or information), Client group (recipients of service), Location (where service is housed), Impact (change in service and how measured), Professionals involved, Service
EPICOT Evidence, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timestamp  
MIP Methodology, Issues, Participants
PCC Population, Concept, Context
PECO Patient/Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcomes
PECODR Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, Duration, Results
PEICO(S) Person, Environment, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, (Stakeholders)
PEO Population and their problems, Exposure, Outcomes or Themes
PESICO Person, Environment, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, (Stakeholders)
PFO Population, Prognostic factors (or models of interest), Outcome
PICO Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes
PICo Population, phenomenon of Interest, Context
PICo Population Intervention or Phenomena of Interest, Context
PICOC Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Context
PICOCPRRST Population or problem, Intervention or exposure, Comparison, Outcome Context or environment or setting, Professionals, Results, Research -incorporating type of question and type of study design, Stakeholder or perspective or potential users, Timeframe or duration
PICOS Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Type
PICOT Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Timeframe
PICOT-D Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time, Digital-data
PICOt Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, timing
PICOT Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timeframe
PICOTS Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Timing, Setting
PICOTT Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Type of question, Type of Study Design
PIE Patient, Intervention/Interest, Evaluation
PIPOH Population (receiving intervention), Intervention, Professionals (delivering intervention), Outcome, Health setting (in which Guideline is to be implemented)
PIPOS Population (receiving intervention), Intervention, Professionals (delivering intervention), Outcome, Setting (in which Guidance is to be implemented)
PIRD Population, Index Test, Reference Test, Diagnosis of Interest
PO Population/Phenomena, Outcome
PS Population Situation
ProPheT Problem, Phenomenon of interest, Timing
SDMO Types of Studies, Types of Data, Types of Methods, Outcomes
SPICE Setting, Perspectuve (Intervention/Interest of Phenomenon), Comparison, Evaluation
SPIDER Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type 

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

1. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Moore G, Tunçalp Ö, Shakibazadeh E. Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Glob Heal. 2019;4(Suppl 1):e001107.

 

Document